arspitzer at earthlink.net
Wed Nov 2 17:24:28 PDT 2011
On 11/2/11 3:27 PM, Martin Phipps wrote:
> On Nov 2, 8:49 am, Tom Russell<joltc... at gmail.com> wrote:
> When he said that I said the following:
> On Oct 29, 5:47 pm, Martin Phipps<martinphip... at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I don't know why it has to be one person's story. In fact, it would
>> be a bad idea if the story focused on Fearless Leader and then it
>> turned out he wasn't going to be an LNHer. At least people can come
>> here and find out that Fearless Leader is supposed to be evil:
>> otherwise writers are going to write Fearless Leader as a good guy and
>> not somebody pretending to be a good guy. I think you should warn
>> people a bit and tell people that Fearless Leader is "semi reserved"
>> by you even though he is Dave's creation: people are free to write
>> Fearless Leader but they have to run it by you.
> I was talking about Fearless Leader but in case it isn't clear by this
> point Arthur was planning to make Fearless Leader and Acton Lord the
> same person. I specifically discussed with Arthur on the Author's
> group that I didn't think he shouldn't be reserving characters without
> letting people know they were reserved.
This is your proof? A post where *You* say I've "semi reserved"
Fearless Leader is some how proof that I've reserved Acton Lord. A post
you wrote not me? That's your proof? Really? (BTW I never said I
reserved or semi reserved Fearless Leader either).
I never bothered to respond to this post probably because parts of it
pissed me off a little bit -- so I never got a chance to correct you
about your misconceptions. I was already thinking about quitting the
project at that time. I would have eventually responded to it, but you
had already posted that lie about me reserving Acton Lord on RACC so
responding to it would have been a moot point.
Me not answering a post of yours doesn't make something you say true,
Arthur "Good Grief" Spitzer
More information about the racc