LNH/META: Villains!

[Martin Phipps]

On Nov 3, 8:24 am, Arthur Spitzer <arspit... at earthlink.net> wrote:
> On 11/2/11 3:27 PM, Martin Phipps wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 2, 8:49 am, Tom Russell<joltc... at gmail.com>  wrote:
>
> > When he said that I said the following:
>
> > On Oct 29, 5:47 pm, Martin Phipps<martinphip... at yahoo.com>  wrote:
> >> I don't know why it has to be one person's story.  In fact, it would
> >> be a bad idea if the story focused on Fearless Leader and then it
> >> turned out he wasn't going to be an LNHer.  At least people can come
> >> here and find out that Fearless Leader is supposed to be evil:
> >> otherwise writers are going to write Fearless Leader as a good guy and
> >> not somebody pretending to be a good guy.  I think you should warn
> >> people a bit and tell people that Fearless Leader is "semi reserved"
> >> by you even though he is Dave's creation: people are free to write
> >> Fearless Leader but they have to run it by you.
>
> > I was talking about Fearless Leader but in case it isn't clear by this
> > point Arthur was planning to make Fearless Leader and Acton Lord the
> > same person.  I specifically discussed with Arthur on the Author's
> > group that I didn't think he shouldn't be reserving characters without
> > letting people know they were reserved.
>
> > Martin
>
> This is your proof?  A post where *You* say I've "semi reserved"
> Fearless Leader is some how proof that I've reserved Acton Lord.  A post
> you wrote not me?  That's your proof?  Really?  (BTW I never said I
> reserved or semi reserved Fearless Leader either).
>
> I never bothered to respond to this post probably because parts of it
> pissed me off a little bit -- so I never got a chance to correct you
> about your misconceptions.  I was already thinking about quitting the
> project at that time.  I would have eventually responded to it, but you
> had already posted that lie

Stop lying.  You had reserved Acton Lord.

Martin