[Admin/RACCies] RACCies announcement/discussion prompt

Jamas Enright thad at eyrie.org
Sat Nov 6 19:57:18 PST 2004


On 5 Nov 2004, Saxon Brenton wrote:

> another moderately amusing stunt. Therefore, pending discussion with you,
> my peers on rec.arts.comics.creative, I provisionally intend to run the
> RACCies for three years, and then discontinue the awards.
>      Other than expressions of regret, are there any comments on this?
> Are there any egregious errors to my reasoning which would be grounds
> for indefinite continuance of the annual awards?

Unlesss something has gone wrong with the server, I'm seeing zeroes
replies to this so far. Which, to me, suggests and overwhelming lack of
interest in this. (Or complete agreement with what you say, hard to tell.)
[That said, Martin has just posted, although about the mechanism for
voting, not about whether or not to have awards.]

In retaliation, let me say: why wait three years? Why not have this year
be the last? Rather than continue to fight declining voting and increasing
frustration on the RACC Awards Organisers behalf (i.e. Saxon's), just pack
them away tidily now.
(Note: I'm not saying 'that's it, never again', just 'put them on hold
until interest swells up'.)

-- 
Jamas Enright
"Answers answered and questions questioned."
Homepage: http://www.eyrie.org/~thad/
Blue Light Productions homepage: http://www.eyrie.org/~thad/blip/

"If a great state has decided by law that twice two is five, it would be
foolish to allow mathematicians to testify." - Comment during the Scopes
Monkey Trial.





More information about the racc mailing list