ietf-nntp LIST EXTENSION response 205 vs 215

Brian Kantor brian at nothing.ucsd.edu
Thu Feb 13 13:00:12 PST 1997

Previous message: ietf-nntp LIST EXTENSION response 205 vs 215
Next message: ietf-nntp LIST EXTENSION response 205 vs 215
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

The second digit in the reply code was never intended as something that
would be strictly enforced by the protocol police.	- Brian

Previous message: ietf-nntp LIST EXTENSION response 205 vs 215
Next message: ietf-nntp LIST EXTENSION response 205 vs 215
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the ietf-nntp mailing list