RACCIES: Hall of Fame-- *record needle scratch*
pwerdna at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 17:43:06 PST 2012
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:53:47 +0000 (UTC), Arthur Spitzer wrote:
> On 1/18/12 5:11 PM, Andrew Perron wrote:
> > Actually, wait a second.
> > The "secret ballot" method of nomination doesn't really work for the Hall
> > of Fame. And you know why?
> Well, it worked the first three times. :)
> (Well, except for the whole few people voting thing)
True true! I'm just thinking that this might work *better*. (Although,
from the lack of response so far..)
> > Therefore, how about this? Let's discuss what we'd like to see on the
> > ballot publically. Let's talk about why the things we're nominating are
> > worth it, and why we should make that dive, and the pearls we'll find
> > we get there.
> If people want to do that they can... don't think it should be
> mandatory... if people want to vote secretly and not explain their vote
> they should be able to do that...
Oh, definitely. And this is more about nominations than about the voting,
which will totally be secret ballot. That said, if one wants to nominate
secretly, I will totally accept it!
> And doesn't look like anyone has responded to this thread yet... maybe
> you could get the ball rolling by posting who you think should be in the
> Hall and why... if you think this is the way to go...
I've been meaning to, but other things have gotten in the way. Time to
roll up my sleeves and wade in!
Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, filling buckets.
More information about the racc