LNH/META: Villains!
Arthur Spitzer
arspitzer at earthlink.net
Mon Oct 31 17:17:22 PDT 2011
On 10/31/11 3:47 PM, Martin Phipps wrote:
> On Oct 31, 12:25 pm, Arthur Spitzer<arspit... at earthlink.net> wrote:
>> On 10/31/11 5:47 AM, Dave Van Domelen wrote:
>>
>> Dave, Martin is lying. I have never said anything about
>> reserving Acton Lord. I dare Martin to point to any post
>> in the Authors Group where I said I was reserving Acton Lord.
>
> I wasn't lying. You said you wanted to use Acton Lord.
Wanting to use Acton Lord and reserving Acton Lord are two different things.
Wanting to use expresses a desire. The other expresses that only you
can write Acton Lord and that you have total control over him.
One pisses Dave off. The other doesn't. I e-mailed Dave and he
understands the difference.
And I believe you understand the difference too. You posted this to
start a flame way and to piss people off.
>
>> I did have a possible idea for Acton Lord as the villain, but
>> was waiting for others input about whether they liked it or
>> had some better ideas for a villain. If we had agreed about
>> Acton Lord I would have certainly asked your permission first
>> if you were okay with it. I would never ever reserve Acton Lord without
>> your permission.
>
> That doesn't make sense. Why ask us if we wanted to use Acton Lord as
> a villain if there was a possibility that Dave could say no?
Well, Dave had just joined up with the group so I assumed he might be
reading it. I mean if he hadn't I would have probably e-mailed him
first. I might have e-mailed him this weekend, but I was already
thinking of quitting this because of your behavior.
Maybe you should have asked me about whether I had gotten Dave's
permission before you posted this.
>
>> Anyway, it doesn't matter now since I'm quitting this project
>> thanks to this post by Martin. And I probably won't involve
>> myself with any other projects that Martin is involved with.
>
> That's just weird.
No, I think not wanting to work with assholes makes a lot of sense. And
this post of yours was probably the straw that broke my back. You've
been acting like an asshole all weekend.. pushing my buttons and pushing
my buttons.
I know that's what you like to do.
You've done it to Mike Escutia, Matt Rossi, Peter Milan, Jesse Willey,
and Tom Russell. It's a pattern with you. And you keep doing.
You push these peoples buttons over and over again. And then you act
surprised when they bite your head off. And you've been doing it to me.
I guess it's what you're good at.
There's a reason why a lot of people on this group don't like you. And
this post of yours is a good example why.
I thought maybe for awhile you were being less of an asshole. I could
probably work with the Martin who helped write ILC. But I can't work
with you.
And part of the reason why I'm quitting is focus more time on Beige
Midnight.
But if you weren't acting like such as asshole, I'd probably be willing
to do one or two issues of this with you.
I really think you could use some therapy or something like that.
There's something very wrong with you Martin. And I suppose one of
those things is you don't seem to be aware that something is wrong with you.
>
> Martin
Arthur "blah blah blah" Spitzer
More information about the racc
mailing list