martinphipps2 at yahoo.com
Mon Oct 31 15:47:55 PDT 2011
On Oct 31, 12:25 pm, Arthur Spitzer <arspit... at earthlink.net> wrote:
> On 10/31/11 5:47 AM, Dave Van Domelen wrote:
> > In article<07f5fbc4-db3f-4ff3-a705-939f0d2ad... at x36g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
> > Martin Phipps<martinphip... at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> We haven't settled on a single villain yet!
> >> Here's a list.
> >> Acton Lord: This guy is reserved by Arthur. Sorry, Arthur but we need
> >> people on RACC to know this if they don't read the Authors group but
> >> are still thinking of participating.
> > Um, no. This sort of thing is what email is for, since while I'm signed
> > up for the Authors Group I haven't been going to check it very often, and
> > finding out now that someone else has reserved my character is a good way to
> > convince me to officially withdraw both my characters and my participation.
> > Dave Van Domelen, was already kinda iffy on the project.
> Dave, Martin is lying. I have never said anything about
> reserving Acton Lord. I dare Martin to point to any post
> in the Authors Group where I said I was reserving Acton Lord.
I wasn't lying. You said you wanted to use Acton Lord.
> I did have a possible idea for Acton Lord as the villain, but
> was waiting for others input about whether they liked it or
> had some better ideas for a villain. If we had agreed about
> Acton Lord I would have certainly asked your permission first
> if you were okay with it. I would never ever reserve Acton Lord without
> your permission.
That doesn't make sense. Why ask us if we wanted to use Acton Lord as
a villain if there was a possibility that Dave could say no?
> Anyway, it doesn't matter now since I'm quitting this project
> thanks to this post by Martin. And I probably won't involve
> myself with any other projects that Martin is involved with.
That's just weird.
More information about the racc