SW09: December 2009: The Mayas Were Right!: Artwork
pwerdna at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 11:16:06 PST 2010
On Jan 25, 9:54Â am, Scott Eiler <sei... at eilertech.com> wrote:
> On Jan 24, 7:23 pm, Andrew Perron <pwer... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 01:22:16 +0000 (UTC), Scott Eiler wrote:
> > > As part of my ongoing effort to catch up with cover art, I've updated
> > > my old RACC High Concept contest entry
> > >http://www.eilertech.com/stories/2009/trillions.htm#maya. Â Cheap and
> > > fast, but hopefully eye-grabbing and descriptive.
> > This one points to The Trillions again
> To the Maya postlude to the Trillions story, actually.
It still points to the top of the page here. Still, I see it now!
> > Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, also, the title should either be "The
> > Mayans Were Right" or "The Maya Were Right".
> I thought so at first too, but the convention seems to be:
> Maya = the civilization itself, or a member thereof.
> Mayan = pertaining to the civilization.
> Mayas = members of the civilization.
> Mayans = not in general use.
> But admittedly my source is the Web. Â If you convince me I'm wrong,
> I'll help you try to convince Wikipedia.
Hmmmm. Wikipedia does indeed use "Mayas", though a quick Google seems
to show "Mayans" as equally represented (for example,
. So it seems that they're both correct for "members of the
civilization". Learn something new every day!
Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, but what of the Olmec?
More information about the racc