META: The Problem of Subjectivity
phippsmartin at hotmail.com
Wed Mar 12 22:11:38 PDT 2008
On Mar 13, 11:59 am, Tom Russell <milos_par... at yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Mar 12, 2:50 pm, Andrew Burton <tuglyrai... at aol.com> wrote:
> > No criticism is objective; even the criticism of spelling errors is
> > subjective, given that some people criticize them and others do not.
> > That said, I think the better question is, "What does it take for
> > something to be considered objective criticism?" And my answer to that,
> > "A complete disconnect from reality."
> I agree 100%.
> A review, a criticism, a dissection, or a discussion is not just about
> the work being discussed, but also about the person doing the
> discussion; any piece of critical writing worth its ink is an opinion
> piece and thus highly personal and subjective.
> I don't even try to be anything except subjective in my own reviews,
> nor have I ever claimed to do otherwise.
I have a problem with reviews that have nothing to do with the story
being reviewed and everything to do with the character of the person
writing the review.
More information about the racc