[NNTP] Extension snapshots 3
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Tue Feb 8 09:05:23 PST 2005
Ken Murchison <ken at oceana.com> writes:
> Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
>> Isn't it easier just to require it? What's the benefit in allowing it
>> to be not provided?
> Based on Russ' input, we're deprecating it because its only use was as a
> limited capability discovery command. In the presence of LIST
> CAPABILITIES, it really serves no purpuse. We're only documenting it so
> that a VERSION 2 server can still support a legacy client (peer).
> I'll defer to whatever Russ thinks is "the right thing".
Yeah, I have a minor preference for leaving open the possibility that in a
future VERSION 2-only world, servers will stop bothering to implement it.
I don't feel strongly about it, but if it doesn't pose any problems I'd
rather go that route.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list