ietf-nntp IHAVE response codes

[Stan O. Barber]

I had actually started work on a new draft in early June. Then, I contracted
food poisoning and was out for three weeks. I am still digging out from the hole
created by that, so I am targeting August to restart the work on the next draft.

Whatever changes in the text have been put forward and consensus has been
reached (or I will ask folks about it and see if consensus has been reached)
will be in that next draft.

If the changes suggested just involved spelling fixes or indentation changes
(for readability), I will be happy to incorporate those that are available by
the end of this month in the next draft.

Russ Allbery wrote:
> 
> Clive D W Feather <clive at demon.net> writes:
> 
> > 8.1.1 and 9.2.X.1 *do* use my suggested format (except with the wrong
> > line wrap indentation in the latter case). If we move all other commands
> > to that format, this can be used to solve your problem at the same
> > time. Doing it this was also means that the text doesn't have to be so
> > careful about listing every possible response, because the "Responses"
> > subsections would be definitive.
> 
> I like the structure of those two sections.  I agree with the proposal to
> redo the other responses sections in that style.  Do you already have new
> text for that available somewhere?
> 
> Stan, could you weigh in with an opinion here?  If Clive rewrote the other
> responses sections in the style of 8.1.1 and 9.2.x.1, could we get that
> into a new draft fairly soonish so that we have some time to pour over it
> again and debug it?
> 
> --
> Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>