ietf-nntp Draft comments

Paul Overell paulo at turnpike.com
Tue Nov 14 02:09:03 PST 2000


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In article <3A102763.7EDB777B at verio.net>, Stan O. Barber <sob at verio.net>
writes
>I have heard nothing since the draft was published at the beginning of the
>month. I know there are a couple of issues that have come up in the past that
>need to be put to bed:
>
>
>2. Section 7 -- Streaming .... There was proposed text on this that I didn't
>include in 11. My concern here is including this in the base specification
>rather than putting it in an extension. I think it makes a great extension, but
>I remain concerned about having in the base.
>

Streaming is widely used today - and it works.  As we are codifying
existing practises then I believe that this needs to be addressed (and
permitted) in the base specification.

If relegated to an extension the implication will be that the base
specification disallows streaming.

Regards  

- -- 
Paul Overell                                             T U R N P I K E

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1

iQA/AwUBOhEPPx8WRy+wdge+EQLCKwCeJsEaDV40aPnC4o0IDnGhHpuNGN8AoItL
YTF7/sMN7A2q+AYpRO0wJHEs
=QKo8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the ietf-nntp mailing list