ietf-nntp Another message from urs@akk.org about tin

[Stan O. Barber]

Lee Kindness wrote:
> 
> In addition to this, I think it is important that the new spec
> mandates this - intelligent/obvious - behaviour:
> 
>   All unrecognised 200 series codes should be assumed as
>   success.
> 
>   All unrecognised 300 series codes should be assumed as
>   notice to continue.
> 
>   All unrecognised 400 series codes should be assumed as
>   temporary error.
> 
>   All unrecognised 500 series codes should be assumed as
>   error.
> 


Seems like a good clarification to me. Any other opinions?