MISC: The Girl Who Saved the World, Part 22
George Phillies
phillies at 4liberty.net
Thu Jan 14 10:16:32 PST 2016
The Girl Who Saved The World, continued
Liouville was a French mathematician. The fellow after him was an
American, Gibbs. What they showed, the part I had to struggle to
understand even slightly, is that the past is as big as the future. No,
let’s be honest. I really did not undertand almost any of the math
parts. For what they needed to prove, they used calculus. I’m not
terrified of a single derivative, at least if someone else is taking it.
I even know sort of what they are. Kind of. I think. Maybe. Well, I
asked Mum what they are, and she told me.
No, I’m not one of these people who have infinite math genius, but Mum
always said I was way ahead in math. That’s way ahead, even though I
actually had to learn the stuff, not have Mum pass it to me
mind-to-mind. Things you learn mind-to-mind you aren’t creative with,
not easily, so I’ll have to work really hard to write great love poems
in Atlanticean. I’m heartbroken, truly heartbroken. Mum did pass me
lots of things not quite mind-to-mind, but she was mostly interested in
helping me learn how to use my gifts effectively. She thought using
gifts was way more important than math, or science, or money technology.
I could learn those the usual way at my usual speed. GR, my usual speed
is not slow.
In any event, Gibbs wrote down a whole forest of derivatives in a big
square block. Down on my study pad went ‘Hamiltonian’, ‘Jacobian’,
‘determinant, ‘permutation’, and a bunch of other words I don’t know. I
suspected there were a lot of parts I did not know yet, even before I
got to the forest of derivatives. When I reached the derivative forest
I took a break for the caramel ice cream and fudge crumbles…a lot of
fudge crumbles. Still, it was a forbidden book, and I have all the time
in the world, if I’m real careful, to learn it. The original Gibbs
proof about the past and the future was two short paragraphs of which I
could make neither head nor tail. The book spent 30 pages breaking the
Gibbs proof up into very small parts. Each part was supposed to be easy
to follow. And the fellow who wrote the small parts is said to be the
greatest science writer since Amizov, Amizov being the muse of clear
science writing. Except when I talked about muses with Mum, for
Terpsichore she had an image of this statue, but for Amizov she
remembered fondly this guy with funny whiskers. I even understood two of
the parts that he wrote. It’s just that after you had followed all the
small parts you had come a very long way, and you wondered if you had
really come all that way or if the wool had been pulled over your eyes.
I skipped to the end. The Forward said it was GR to skip like that.
There was the image, translating the forest of derivatives to a simple
picture. The picture I understood. I think. The picture is pawns on a
huge chessboard. The pawns represent whole worlds where history started
out slightly differently. They start out next to each other, farther
away sideways being stranger. By the time you get well sideways across
the chessboard, history is completely different. The simple view of
history is that the pawns all move forward one space at the time, always
staying in their own file. Worlds that start very similar to ours end up
very similar to ours. Worlds that start out very different end up being
very different. The butterflies show that every so often a pawn takes
off sideways, so two pawns that start next to each other do not end up
that way. The pawn next to ours marches off sideways and ends up halfway
sideways across the board. That’s the maiasaurs not becoming
intelligent. You might think that would simply leave a gap in the file
next to ours. No, there are as many files at the start of history as
there are the end. What Liouville and Gibbs showed, and someday I will
understand that part of the book, is that every file was full at the
start of time, so when we reach the present every file must still be
full, one pawn per file. If the pawn next to us took off and ended up
way across the board, there must be another pawn that started off
someplace way across the board and ended up at our shoulders. I thought
the mirror imaging looked pretty obvious. We’re not someplace special.
If some of our nearby-at-start pawns end up someplace else, pawns from
someplace else must end up nearby, because if they didn’t we would be at
someplace unusual. Lots of people get extremely upset with the idea
that world history could’ve started off completely different than ours,
but when we get to the present our two worlds are almost the same.
Liouville’s Butterflies, the forbidden book, is the famous proof that
some worlds must converge. The rest of the book is the arguments about
what Liouville’s result means.
All good things come to an end. Liouville’s Butterflies was no
exception. I looked up and realized it was well after dark outside. GR,
it’s January. Dark happens early. My mocha pot was empty. For all I
hadn’t understood most of it, I had really been concentrating on the
book, concentrating hard enough that I didn’t think about my pain. I
still hurt, a lot. I’d dodged the sword. At the end, just as I slit him
the fellow from end to end, I’d had to take getting gut-punched. Hard.
Before I started reading I’d remembered to pull up a quilt, so I hadn’t
gotten cold. My gifts will protect me from cold, but only when I’m
calling them. I left the rest of the book for tomorrow.
More information about the racc
mailing list