META: Real life RACC/LNH Con in 2012?
Arthur Spitzer
arspitzer at earthlink.net
Thu May 12 15:25:57 PDT 2011
On 5/11/11 2:49 PM, EDMLite wrote:
> On May 10, 9:48 pm, Scott Eiler<sei... at eilertech.com> wrote:
>
>> Well then. The Bay Area is obviously closer for me, and I like it
better on
>> personal experience, but I can't say it's cheaper for anyone. If I
had to pick
>> California, I'd pick whatever airport is easiest for people to
travel to.
>
> We have three airports in the Bay Area. I'm guessing SFO would
> work out for most international travelers, and Oakland is a pretty
> good bet for Americans, especially those able to travel on
> Southwest (Arthur, I'm looking at you).
Looking at the prices of tickets for Yuma to SF... it would probably be
cheaper to drive there than go by plane...
And probably a lot stressful too... I haven't been on a plane since I
was 10 years old (a trip to SF funny enough)...
They strip search passengers now days? :)
Anyways, if this con goes to the Bay... I suppose there are enough
people now for me to make the trip...
Still holding out hope for a bunch of RACC'rs who will want it in LA...
>
>> But... How about Las Vegas? Boy, it's cheap in the summer.
>
> I should not be allowed to return to Las Vegas. Especially if we
> get J.O.S.Hartung to come to this...
>
> --Rob Rogers
> --Knows that's what he gets
> for waking up in Vegas
Arthur "You haven't won yet, Mr. Rogers!" Spitzer
More information about the racc
mailing list