SW10/HCC: March 2011: The Perils of the Wolf-Woman!

[Andrew Perron]

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 01:36:03 +0000 (UTC), Scott Eiler wrote:

> Andrew Perron wrote:
>> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 03:27:55 +0000 (UTC), Scott Eiler wrote:
>> 
>>> ?WORLD JOURNAL MONTHLY
>>> March 6, 2011
>> 
>> Who's reporting this, anyway?
> 
> Good question.  The senior staff at the Journal are all co-editors now.  The 
> junior staff haven't graduated to their own bylines yet.  They're probably still 
> interns.

Fair enough, though I was *really* wondering how the Journal got this
information.

>>> The Wolf-Woman may 
>>> lactate to feed her wolf-children, but she's still a virgin!
>> 
>> ...what?
> 
> I *tried* to explain that in the story.  Neither wolf nor man would lay with 
> her; she's too weird to appeal to grown males of either species.  Even when 
> Imperilus had her on a chain, he left her virginity alone.

See, I got that, but... wolf-children?

>>> The Unicorn and his children were posturing.  Jo the Sasquatch knew when 
>>> creatures did that, because she knew humans.  So she knew what to do.  
>> 
>>> Then the horned human lunged.  Jo smacked his horn aside easily. But then the 
>>> horned sea creature struck!  Jo took a wound to her shoulder.  But she smacked 
>>> the creature aside.
>> 
>> Both of these feel awkwardly phrased.
> 
> Maybe wrong phrase order in the first one and too many "buts" on the last one, 
> I'll admit.

I was thinking to many "smack"s, but that's fair too.

> I might have sent the original message in "UTF-8" format.  Let me try "Send
> Anyway" instead.

There we go.

Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, charset us-ascii.