Andrew Perron pwerdna at gmail.com
Sat Apr 30 18:57:01 PDT 2011

On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:59:44 +0000 (UTC), Scott Eiler wrote:

> These are *not* story inserts.  I splattered a certain new story element 
> throughout both those episodes.  I also took advantage of the rewrite to respond 
> to other review comments.
> This stuff is *already* available via story links at 
> http://www.eilertech.com/stories/2011/ .  You can read them there right now. 
> Should I even repost them in RACC?

I think so!

> If I do repost, is the tag "REPOST" appropriate, or is there a "REWRITE" tag?

The former seems fine to me.

> In the repost, should I try to insult your intelligence by saying what's new and 
> what's not throughout the story?  Like, with a note saying, "--- Exit Plot 
> Element ---" shortly after the plot element is forcibly removed?

Eh, I wouldn't.

> My change notes are not published.  (They're all in my mind right now.)  If I 
> *were* to repost in RACC, I'd have some Author Notes up front, to describe the 
> changes.  (That's part of why a repost will have to wait, even though the 
> story's out there now.)

That makes sense.

Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, the BeeGees, my god~

More information about the racc mailing list