pwerdna at gmail.com
Sat Apr 30 18:57:01 PDT 2011
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 03:59:44 +0000 (UTC), Scott Eiler wrote:
> These are *not* story inserts. I splattered a certain new story element
> throughout both those episodes. I also took advantage of the rewrite to respond
> to other review comments.
> This stuff is *already* available via story links at
> http://www.eilertech.com/stories/2011/ . You can read them there right now.
> Should I even repost them in RACC?
I think so!
> If I do repost, is the tag "REPOST" appropriate, or is there a "REWRITE" tag?
The former seems fine to me.
> In the repost, should I try to insult your intelligence by saying what's new and
> what's not throughout the story? Like, with a note saying, "--- Exit Plot
> Element ---" shortly after the plot element is forcibly removed?
Eh, I wouldn't.
> My change notes are not published. (They're all in my mind right now.) If I
> *were* to repost in RACC, I'd have some Author Notes up front, to describe the
> changes. (That's part of why a repost will have to wait, even though the
> story's out there now.)
That makes sense.
Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, the BeeGees, my god~
More information about the racc