REV: End of Month Reviews #75 - March 2010 [spoilers]
saxonbrenton at hotmail.com
Sun May 2 11:07:58 PDT 2010
Andrew Perron wrote:
> Tom Russell wrote:
>> Um... er...
>> Well, there's a reason why I said I wasn't one hundred percent happy
>> with this one. :-/
> Honestly, I liked it - her ambiguity was very interesting. And the fact
> that she's not directly making a statement would provide some leeway for
> the authorities - *if* they wanted to avoid doing her in.
Oh, I agree entirely. Like I said, I overanalayse these things too much.
Once I realised there would be no explanantion and applied the Mystery
Science Theatre 3000 mantra to it (remember that it's just a show, you
really should relax...), wel, I can appreciate it as a character piece
on its own merits. I suppose the thing to remember is that this is a story
nominally in the four colour superhero gere, so it's not a question of
'should I apply willing suspension of disbelief?' but rather 'how much
willing suspension of disbelief, and where?'
Browse profiles for FREE! Meet local singles online.
More information about the racc