CONTEST: High Concept #5 results!

Scott Eiler seiler at
Sun Jan 17 10:37:26 PST 2010

On Jan 16, 1:39 am, Andrew Perron <pwer... at> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:37:50 +0000 (UTC), Dave Van Domelen wrote:
> >      Rather than do the same thing as in the last tie (each winner submit a
> > concept, writers mix and match however they want), I decided to do something
> > a little different.  High Concept Mad Libs!
> >      Scott will email me a reasonably short sentence for a concept, with
> > blanks for one noun, one verb and one adjective, in any order.  "Reasonably
> > short" in this case meaning that the blanks will actually be important.
> > Saxon will email me a noun, a verb and an adjective.  Once this has happened,
> > I will post the result!
> I like it. XD
> Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, "uranium" was always my favorite Mad
> Libs noun.  I was a weird kid.

Wow, sounds like fun, especially if Saxon doesn't get to read the
sentence with the blanks first.  Now, if only someone could just come
up with that sentence, I'd be all set.

(Well, really, I just need a few hours to think about it.  If nothing
else works, I can pick a sentence at random from somewhere and *make*
it have blanks.)

More information about the racc mailing list