[META] Other People's Stories

Andrew Perron pwerdna at gmail.com
Mon Aug 16 14:43:15 PDT 2010

On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:47:30 +0000 (UTC), Saxon Brenton wrote:

> Well... The answer that Dvandom gave is the most sensible 'broad' answer.
> With regards to the Just Imagine cascade, or indeed any cascade on RACC, 
> I would say that you have a lot of leeway in this.  Simply put, the nature 
> of the story writing process for cascades means that the cascade is 'open'.
> A cascade is expected and indeed *encouraged* to have multiple authors 
> picking up on what has gone before.  Whether that 'openness' should carry 
> through as far as archiving is concerned is admittedly a somewhat different 
> matter.  My guess is that most RACC writers would be more comfortable 
> having a collected cascade be put up in an archive than other writings 
> (especially other serious writings).  So, while I may be wrong about this 
> I would say: yeah, sure, go ahead and put up the whole lot for context purposes.

This makes a lot of sense. Okay, I'll go for it!

> Saxon Brenton
> tV trOpes wiKi  *HUnGeRS*  and wAnts to EaT all yoUr frEe tiMe

Today, the Magic: The Gathering website used the term "Trope Namer".  It's

> Think. Green. Do.
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.

Andrew "NO .SIG MAN" "Juan" Perron, time to play that great game for all
ages, Fix That Punctuation!

More information about the racc mailing list