LNH: Sexuality and Assumptions

[Martin Phipps]

On Sep 30, 8:12 am, Tom Russell <milos_par... at yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Sep 29, 7:07 pm, Martin Phipps <martinphip... at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sep 30, 12:04 am, Tom Russell <milos_par... at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Like the time I sent Martin Rock to jail without a
> > > trial, in clear violation of civil rights (as you said again and again
> > > and again), where I implied that it was a bail hearing and that he had
> > > been remanded to custody.  And, again, by implying I mean, writing the
> > > words, "Martin Rock's bail hearing" and that the judge said he was
> > > "remanded to custody".  Boy, you really got me there.  I just wasn't
> > > man enough to admit it!
>
> > You accuse me of not bein g able to take criticism but you clearly
> > react negatively to valid criticism yourself.
>
> ((whoosh))
>
> Do you understand that when someone is denied bail, they're remanded
> to custody in a prison to await trial, and that in no way violates
> civil rights?  This is an actual thing.  I'm not making it up,
> honest.  You may have even seen a scene in a film or TV show where a
> lawyer visits their client in prison, before and during the trial.
> This really happens.  It is an absurdly simple concept, and failing to
> grasp it does not in any way constitute a valid criticism of my work.

Martin Rock had no superpowers (as far as they know) and they put him
in grave danger.  Of course, this was required for the plot to work.

Martin