REVIEW: LNH Comics Presents # 91 (ILC 56)

Martin phippsmartin at
Wed Jun 27 20:12:42 PDT 2007

On Jun 28, 5:46 am, Tom Russell <milos_par... at> wrote:
> On Jun 27, 9:42 am, Martin <phippsmar... at> wrote:
> > I was talking about direct comparisons.  Separate comparisons
> > obviously are not comparisons.  If you say "X is good" and "Y is good"
> > then you haven't compared X and Y in any way.  You have to be careful
> > when you make direct comparisons such as:
> > "Some authors are very good at always delivering on that essential
> > premise-- Saxon, Rob, and Jamas are quite masterful at it.  Mitchell
> > was really able to deliver with the PC Person story-- less-so with the
> > Bad Timing Boy one."
> I fail to see the difference.

"Some authors are very good..." implies that "some authors aren't very


More information about the racc mailing list