[REVIEW] End of Month Reviews #47 - November 2007 [spoilers]
martinphipps2 at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 4 08:26:31 PST 2007
On Dec 4, 11:26 pm, dvan... at haven.eyrie.org (Dave Van Domelen) wrote:
> In article <165298.1449... at web50507.mail.re2.yahoo.com>,
> Martin Phipps <martinphip... at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 2, 12:09 pm, Lalo Martins
> ><lalo.mart... at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think I remember some older material, especially
> >from Martin,
> >> describing the four fundamental forces of physics in
> >the usenetverse to
> >> be net-related things. I don't remember all four,
> >but lag (thus Lagneto)
> >> was there.
> >Actually you may be thinking of Jamas who identified
> >the four net.elements as thread, spham, crosspost and
> >lag. What I did was say that if Lagneto creates a
> >lagnetic field then he must emit "lagons". I then
> >suggested that lagons are quantums of trafficolagnetic
> >radiation. Now if you want to argue that the other
> >three forces (corresponding to gravity and the nuclear
> >forces) are thread, spham and crosspost the go ahead.
> I don't recall if I was the first, but before Jamas I was using the
> net.elements of thread (water), flame (fire), pixel (earth) and net (air).
Jamas's four elements were flame, spham, crosspost and lag. I was
going from memory and I misspoke.
More information about the racc