REVIEWS: The Phippsian Reader
thad at eyrie.org
Sat May 14 13:22:35 PDT 2005
On 14 May 2005 phippsmartin at hotmail.com wrote:
> You make it sound as if I'm doing something new. Truth is that fourth
> wall breaking is extremely hard to do. It usually falls flat. Maybe
> 90% of my stuff falls flat because I break the fourth wall. But if I
> don't break the fourth wall then it is not an LNH story.
Although that isn't too imply you can't have an LNH story without breaking
the fourth wall. <...tries to think of an example...then remembers that he
himself broke the fourth wall in his latest issue of Alt.Riders, so shuts
> Others go further to the point of changing people's names too. Jamas
> once had a character refer to the "actress" JulIO Roberts and then
> pointed out that, in making the joke, he had given her a man's name.
> That's devotion.
...and I'm pretty sure that wasn't me. I usually find trying to come up
with net-based names to get in the way of telling the story. You thinking
> Or perhaps I was just writing a review of The Day After Tomorrow in as
> entertaining a way as possible. Does it not bother you that the
> science in the movie was a bit misleading?
You went to an Emmerich movie expecting proper science??
> Speaking of Roland Emmerich, one is faced with the same conundrum
> regarding the movie Independence Day: there's no way that mankind would
> have been able to fight an enemy as powerful as the aliens were
> established to be at the beginning of the movie. Mankind should have
> been dead at the end of the movie.
Hey, those aliens only attacked the Northern hemisphere. The rest of us
would have been fine. :)
> The fact that mankind not only
> survived but won is nothing but a cheat, a way to salvage a happy
> ending even though millions, if not billions, have died. To a lesser
oh look, you misspelt "but a cheat, a way to prove that AMERICA IS THE
BEST F*&KING COUNTRY IN THE ENTIRE F^#KING WORLD, AND SCREW EVERYONE
ELSE", which was the point of the movie. (Although I admit this point is
almost subtle compared with how it's presented in Armageddon...)
(That said, this seems to be the point of most big budget Hollywood
"Answers answered and questions questioned."
Blue Light Productions homepage: http://www.eyrie.org/~thad/blip/
"If a great state has decided by law that twice two is five, it would be
foolish to allow mathematicians to testify." - Comment during the Scopes
More information about the racc