[NNTP] Errata 1522 and 2719 for RFC 3977
Barry Leiba
barryleiba at computer.org
Tue May 15 05:38:01 PDT 2012
Hi, Clive.
> I'm not clear why these are Held for Document Update - they should be
> Verified.
See the IESG statement on processing of errata:
https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/errata-processing.html
In particular:
> 1. Only errors that could cause implementation or deployment problems or
> significant confusion should be Approved.
...and...
> 5. Typographical errors which would not cause any confusions to implementation
> or deployments should be Hold for Document Update.
So Lisa and Peter, respectively, were correct in their handling of those two.
Barry
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list