[NNTP] [Errata Rejected] RFC3977 (2004)

[Barry Leiba]

>> I'd be happy, if Clive, Russ, and Julien all think it's the right
>> approach, to change the erratum to "hold for document update".  Russ
>> Allbery, do you have a comment on this?
>
> Yes, please.  We would clearly want to fix this in any revision of RFC
> 3977.  Personally, I would recommend that any implementor use 423 as
> described in Julien's analysis despite the wording of RFC 3977.

OK, that works for me.

RFC Editor, will you please switch errata #2004 from "rejected" to
"hold for document update"?  Thanks.

Barry