[NNTP] Additions to LIST commands
Julien ÉLIE
julien at trigofacile.com
Tue Nov 17 12:20:20 PST 2009
Hi Russ,
> But I think the
> idea of reading the junk group via a regular GROUP junk command is a bit
> dubious. I'm not sure how many people would do that.
At least on fr.*, a few people like to add "Followup-To: junk" on certain
occasions; and read (and sometimes respond) to answers which kept that
follow up.
> Currently in the INN implementation, j is roughly equivalent to =junk.
"roughly" :)
As I wrote in news.software.nntp, if:
- group1 is status "j",
- group2 is status "=junk",
- group3 is status "y",
then :
* a local post to group1 only will be accepted (and filed into "junk")
whereas a local post to group2 only will not be accepted;
* a crosspost to group1,group3 will be filed into only group3 whereas
a crosspost to group2,group3 will be rejected if it is a local post
and filed into "junk" and group3 if it comes from a peer.
--
Julien ÉLIE
« Un seul être vous manque et tout est dépeuplé. » (Alphonse de Lamartine)
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list