[NNTP] AD Evaluation of draft-ietf-nntpext-streaming-05

[Ken Murchison]

Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> 
> rfc2234bis should pop out of the RFC Editor queue before this one does (the
> IESG can make that requirement clear to the RFC Editor if need be), so no, I
> don't see a risk of delay.  The only "process" to does this without changing
> the reference would be to put text in an IESG note to the RFC Editor asking
> them to revise the reference if rfc2234bis is available as an RFC before the
> WG documents are.

Is there standard boilerplate for this?  Does it belong in a separate 
section, or just as a note within the references?


-- 
Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--    http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp