[NNTP] NNTP Extensions drafts

[Russ Allbery]

Ken Murchison <ken at oceana.com> writes:

> Mainly just to stay current, with the exception of RFC2222bis, which is
> now going to require the use of the SASLprep profile of StringPrep for
> authorization ID.

It looks like RFC2222bis is one of the ones that isn't even in Last Call
yet.  Hm.  We do require SASLprep ourselves; do we need to also depend on
the version of RFC2222 that requires it?

> I don't believe that there any updates to the SASL mech docs or TLS docs
> which have any bearing on our work, so I can fallback to the current
> RFCs and let the editor update them if possible.

That sounds good to me.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>