[NNTP] NNTP Extensions drafts

[Scott Hollenbeck]

Ken,

I'll let you and the working group decide which references are appropriate.
I just want the question resolved before I start the last calls.

Changing normative references would not be a good idea in auth48.  If you
reference I-Ds, the RFC Editor will take care of the needed updates.
They'll also hold the documents until all normative references are queued
for RFC publication.

-Scott-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Murchison [mailto:ken at oceana.com] 
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 10:45 AM
> To: Scott Hollenbeck
> Cc: 'Russ Allbery'; ietf-nntp at lists.eyrie.org
> Subject: Re: [NNTP] NNTP Extensions drafts
> 
> Scott Hollenbeck wrote:
> 
> >>Actually all of the drafts in the references are updates to 
> existing 
> >>RFCs (except for NNTP-AUTH and NNTP-TLS).  I could just 
> reference the 
> >>current RFCs if you want.  Let me know what you want me to 
> >>do, and I'll 
> >>resubmit right away if necessary.
> > 
> > 
> > I'd very much prefer corrected drafts before I start the last call
> > processes.
> 
> So, do you recommend that I only reference the existing RFCs and not 
> worry about the fact that they are being updated?
> 
> I suppose that if any of these updates move to RFC status 
> later, either 
> the editor will make the change, or I can make the change during the 
> last 48 hour review.
> 
> -- 
> Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
> Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
> 716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
> --PGP Public Key--    http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp
>