[NNTP] LISTGROUP wording

Peter Robinson pmrobinson at gmx.net
Tue May 10 15:33:40 PDT 2005


Clive D.W. Feather <clive at demon.net> wrote:

> Peter Robinson said:
>
> > On the other hand, requiring servers to store the group name (for GROUP
> > with no parameters or the long changed LISTGROUP response) is a real
> > issue.
> 
> The two need to be considered together, I think. If LISTGROUP remains
> changed, the GROUP bit is not significant IMO.

I agree.  And I really hope we don't have to backtrack on the LISTGROUP
response, since it's much neater the way we have it now.

Peter



More information about the ietf-nntp mailing list