[NNTP] Future-proofing for including capabilities in responses
Ken Murchison
ken at oceana.com
Mon Mar 28 06:40:40 PST 2005
Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
>
> Having said all that (yet again), let me point out that if you really do
> want to put data in the free text, then using a delimiter like [] is a bad
> idea for at least two reasons:
> - it's not unlikely that it's been used already (having semantics in
> natural languages);
> - it leads to more questions, such as whether you can have multiple []
> clauses and, if so, which ones have meaning.
Then pick something that isn't likely to appear in the wild, e.g.:
[: :] or [! !] or <? ?>
Using non-ASCII seems overkill.
I think at this point we've reached consensus that this would only be
necessary if we want to put the capabilities in the initial greeting (we
can use a multiline responses elsewhere), so this discussion is probably
moot. But I really don't see what the big deal is with putting the
capabilities in the free text. IMAP added it and nobody squealed.
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list