[NNTP] Revisiting POST as a separate capability
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at demon.net
Fri Mar 25 00:58:59 PST 2005
Jeffrey M. Vinocur said:
> (I mean, if we did forbid it, a server that
> theoretically wanted to do this could simply provide hardcoded versions
> of READER commands that return responses consistent with a server
> having no groups -- and a client could still try to post if it wanted
> to.
For that matter, just because READER (and therefore POST) isn't advertised
doesn't stop a server implementing POST.
--
Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive at demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert | Home: <clive at davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc | |
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list