[NNTP] Re: New NNTP drafts approaching IETF Last Call

[Clive D.W. Feather]

Charles Lindsey said:
>>> However, the wording in the present draft is slightly misleading, since it
>>> seems to suggest that the arbitrary mixture of octets might contain NUL or
>>> naked CR or LF. So perhaps the second sentence would better say:
> 
>> It doesn't need anything saying. This paragraph is a NOTE. The normative
>> text is item 1 of the numbered list immediately before it.
> 
> Sure, but even NOTEs have to be well written. Clearly, Mark DID
> misunderstand it. Therefore there MIGHT be some benefit in considering
> alternative wordings.

I still think it's unneeded, but I've added "(subject to that same
requirement)" before "it MAY include octets above and below 128 mixed
arbitrarily".

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive at demon.net>   | Tel:    +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive at davros.org>  | Fax:    +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc            |                            |