[NNTP] STREAMING diffs (take 2)

Ken Murchison ken at oceana.com
Tue Jun 14 13:58:20 PDT 2005


Russ Allbery wrote:
> 
> Okay, it seems like we do have consensus on making no changes to the
> security section, and the only question is over whether or not to add
> additional documentation on the use of deferrals and a pre-commit cache.

Are we certain that we don't need/want to discuss TAKETHIS in the 
security section?  I'm not pushing hard for it, I just don't want to 
skip it if we feel its justified.  Of course a malicious client could 
abuse the server in the same fashion with POST or IHAVE and just not 
wait for the initial response, so maybe TAKETHIS isn't all that unique.

I think any discussion of a pre-commit cache or "locking" is strictly an 
implementation issue and outside of the protocol.

-- 
Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--    http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp



More information about the ietf-nntp mailing list