[NNTP] STREAMING diffs (take 2)
Ken Murchison
ken at oceana.com
Tue Jun 14 13:58:20 PDT 2005
Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Okay, it seems like we do have consensus on making no changes to the
> security section, and the only question is over whether or not to add
> additional documentation on the use of deferrals and a pre-commit cache.
Are we certain that we don't need/want to discuss TAKETHIS in the
security section? I'm not pushing hard for it, I just don't want to
skip it if we feel its justified. Of course a malicious client could
abuse the server in the same fashion with POST or IHAVE and just not
wait for the initial response, so maybe TAKETHIS isn't all that unique.
I think any discussion of a pre-commit cache or "locking" is strictly an
implementation issue and outside of the protocol.
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list