[NNTP] Header terminology

[Russ Allbery]

Clive D W Feather <clive at demon.net> writes:
> Russ Allbery said:

>> Forwarding from USEFOR.  What do folks think about making the editorial
>> changes noted below for compatibility with mail terminology?  See the
>> end of Richard's message for the exact details; other than in the base
>> document (which might not be worth the hassle), the changes are trivial
>> and I don't think they reduce the readability any.

> Richard is a colleague of mine when not off doing his Ph.D., so if I
> *don't* change the base document, he will nag me to death next time he's at
> the desk next to mine :-)

> It's a pity that this happened just after the post-Last Call draft went
> off.

> When I get a moment, I'll look to see what the changes would be like.

We may be able to take care of it with a note to the RFC editor, depending
on how simple and mechanical the changes are.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>