[NNTP] Extensions drafts
Ken Murchison
ken at oceana.com
Tue Jun 7 13:07:10 PDT 2005
I was sent a message offline about the fact that the extension drafts
discuss some of the generic responses (namely 480, 483, 504), but don't
list them in the formal syntax/response sections. I realize that these
responses are valid for *any* command, but I can see the point that
since we're outside of the base document that they it may be worth
listing them as valid responses and mentioning that they are defined in
the base doc. Thoughts?
--
Kenneth Murchison Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer 21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26 Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key-- http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list