[NNTP] FW: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-nntpext-base>

[Scott Hollenbeck]

Russ,

Check out the archives linked-to from this web page:

http://www.academ.com/academ/nntp/ietf.html

(this page is listed on the IETF charter page)

This page seems to have archives for as recently as February 2005.

The web page should be fixable by sending the needed corrections to the
Secretariat.  I'll approve them, and the request will be tracked.  Could you
try to have the page updated again, please?

Please keep me posted on the document update and we'll get this through as
quickly as possible.

The other last calls end today.  More info coming on those no later than
tomorrow.

-Scott-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Russ Allbery [mailto:rra at stanford.edu] 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 1:27 PM
> To: ietf-nntp at lists.eyrie.org
> Cc: Scott Hollenbeck
> Subject: Re: [NNTP] FW: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-nntpext-base>
> 
> Scott Hollenbeck <sah at 428cobrajet.net> writes:
> 
> > The IETF last call for draft-ietf-nntpext-base has 
> completed.  I'm not
> > sure that all of the last call questions were resolved (I'd 
> point to the
> > messages, but the WG list archives appear to be both 
> mis-identified on
> > the IETF WG charter page and incomplete here:
> 
> > https://mailman.academ.com/pipermail/ietf-nntp/
> 
> > the archive situation REALLY needs to be fixed):
> 
> I've tried to get the IETF WG charter page fixed a couple times.  I
> thought it took the last time, but apparently it didn't.  The list
> archives are at:
> 
>     <http://lists.eyrie.org/pipermail/ietf-nntp/>
> 
> for everything after August of 2004, which is when we moved 
> the mailing
> list because the previous server was having too many difficulties.
> 
> Of course, the lack of update to the IETF WG charter page is 
> probably also
> why the list doesn't get any spam.  *wry grin*
> 
> > 1. Is the new base spec supposed to obsolete or update 2980?
> 
> I believe it's supposed to update 2980.
> 
> > 2. Example on page 50.
> 
> > I didn't see any other comments other than the General Area one from
> > Spencer Dawkins and I don't think there's anything there to 
> address.  If
> > we can get through these quickly and have the document 
> updated before 16
> > June I can have it scheduled for IESG review during the 23 June
> > telechat.
> 
> That sounds great!
> 
> -- 
> Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu)             
> <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
>