[NNTP] Article number wording
Urs Janßen
urs at tin.org
Fri Jul 29 02:55:55 PDT 2005
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:49:50AM +0700, Steve Walker wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >No matter what we say or don't say in this draft, you're still going to
> >have serious problems in two years with regular news reader clients.
> >
>
> I think that the clients that currently don't support 64 bit numbers
> will be fixed soon since it's a very easy process. That is, if the RFC
I (as a client author) don't think so - it's not easy to fix code which
runns on a bunch of different (some very old and/or obscure) unices.
exceeding 32bit artnums within the next ~5 years means asking for trouble,
no matter that the RFCs say.
> doesn't expressly forbid 64 bit numbers. If the new RFC forbids 64 bit
> numbers then the client developers will have to choose between being
> non-compliant and actually working on all servers. This is a potential
> mess.
as most servers (>99%) won't exceed the 32bit artnums within the next ~5
years client authors do not have fix it emediately...
IMHO we should leave the artnum stuff for the next RFC.
urs
--
"Only whimps use tape backup: _real_ men just upload their important stuff
on ftp, and let the rest of the world mirror it ;)" - Linus
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list