[NNTP] Re: GenART reviews of draft-ietf-nntpext-tls-nntp-07 and draft-ietf-nntpext-authinfo-09

[Ken Murchison]

Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
> Russ Allbery said:
> 
>>For informative references, I believe it's fine to just reference the
>>draft and let the RFC Editor deal with it.  The concern with referencing
>>drafts was additional hold-up at the publishing stage when we don't
>>actually care whether we go with the current reference or the later
>>reference, but my understanding is that that this concern doesn't apply to
>>informative references.
> 
> 
> I handled all this through a note to the RFC Editor:

I have the same language in AUHTINFO, but the problem is that SASL 
(normative) and SASL/GSSAPI (informative) are being split into separate 
I-Ds which I originally referenced.  After our last discussion on this, 
we decided to only use RFCs, which then makes RFC 2222 both normative 
and informative.


-- 
Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--    http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp