[NNTP] Re: GenART reviews of draft-ietf-nntpext-tls-nntp-07 and draft-ietf-nntpext-authinfo-09

[Ken Murchison]

Ned Freed wrote:

> Why not simply refer to draft-ietf-sasl-gssapi-02.txt - I assume that's
> the document you're talking about. There's nothing wrong with having
> a reference to an I-D; the RFC Editor knows how to handle them.

That's what I originally had, but discussion on the list urged/forced me 
to only reference RFCs and include the note to the editor to update the 
references if the appropriate I-Ds moved to RFCs before our document. 
I'll gladly go back to referencing the most current I-Ds.

Russ?


> I have to say I'm always amused when this happens: Wording which was good
> enough to be published in one RFC doesn't pass muster when reused.

Me too.  Its happened a few times with both docs, which pretty much 
stole all applicable text from the SASL and TLS profiles for IMAP, POP3 
and SMTP.

-- 
Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--    http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp