[NNTP] Snapshot 6
Russ Allbery
rra at stanford.edu
Fri Jan 7 09:58:26 PST 2005
Clive D W Feather <clive at demon.net> writes:
> Ken Murchison said:
>>> OVER and HDR should be separate capabilities because they *can* be
>>> used by message-ID (and note that we still have HEAD in the mandatory
>>> commands).
>> Would a transit server really support either of these?
> Pass, but I could make an argument for it if I tried.
I doubt it, but I also don't want to deal with having different arguments
for the two different OVER styles.
>> Like I said earlier, I'm not going to make a big stink about this, but
>> I think making LISTGROUP an argument to READER and leaving HDR and OVER
>> as separate capabilities is a good compromise (for all of the reasons
>> Clive mentioned).
> Works for me. Done.
Sounds good here.
--
Russ Allbery (rra at stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list