[NNTP] Extension snapshots 2

Clive D.W. Feather clive at demon.net
Fri Jan 7 07:45:20 PST 2005


Ken Murchison said:
> In
> agreement with [SASL], if a security layer is established as part of
> the authentication, the server MUST continue to advertise the SASL
> capability in response to a CAPABILITIES command with the same list of
> SASL mechanisms as before authentication (thereby enabling the client
> to detect a possible active down-negotiation attack)."

Can we drop the condition, and just have the SASL capability be advertised
throughout the session?

If it's a useful technique at all (I remain skeptical) then leave the
possibility open no matter who's providing the security.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive at demon.net>   | Tel:    +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive at davros.org>  | Fax:    +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc            |                            |



More information about the ietf-nntp mailing list