[NNTP] LISTGROUP wording

[Ken Murchison]

Clive D.W. Feather wrote:

> Russ Allbery said:
> 
>>>Have we decided if LISTGROUP is going to be mandatory to implement if
>>>READER is advertised?  If so, then the indicating capability is simply
>>>"READER".
>>
>>I have, so far, not heard any objections to making it mandatory in the
>>latest round of discussion.
> 
> 
> Do Andrew's comments count as an objection? If so, what happens next?

Obviously, I'm not going to speak for Andrew, but I took his comments as 
a possible objection to the LISTGROUP initial response line changing 
format, not an objection to making LISTGROUP mandatory.

-- 
Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--    http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp