[NNTP] LISTGROUP
Andrew - Supernews
andrew at supernews.net
Tue Apr 26 11:59:57 PDT 2005
>>>>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <rra at stanford.edu> writes:
> "Andrew - Supernews" <andrew at supernews.net> writes:
>> Did someone sneak in a change to the LISTGROUP result text while I
>> wasn't looking? LISTGROUP traditionally does _NOT_ return the same
>> output as GROUP does; that may be a wart, but it's worth noting that
>> there is _no other place_ in the protocol that requires the server
>> to remember the name of the current group.
Russ> Yeah, this was changed quite a while back and is what INN
Russ> currently does. At least year or two, I think, and there was a
Russ> fair bit of discussion about it at the time. I don't recall
Russ> any concerns being raised at the time; do you feel that this is
Russ> going to cause problems?
It certainly will for me, because I never store the group name
anywhere in reader code, and in a lot of places I use only
md5(groupname) as an internal equivalent.
I must have missed it before, or didn't catch the implications... I'll
have to go back and look.
--
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list