[NNTP] Re: [ietf-nntp] draft-ietf-nntpext-streaming-01.txt

[Ken Murchison]

Russ Allbery wrote:

>> 432 is, according to my records, previously unused.  (Which is somewhat
> suspicious -- I wonder why it was skipped over originally.)
> 
> 431 is used for a deferral after CHECK, but we shouldn't reuse that code
> since a deferral after TAKETHIS is different and the two may be
> intermingled.  436 is used as the deferral for IHAVE, both as an initial
> response and after the article was sent.  We could potentially use it, but
> I'm not sure if that's a good idea or not.

Actually (maybe I'm being thick and/or short-sighted), but does it 
matter whether we're getting deferred via CHECK or TAKETHIS?  In either 
case we're going to have to try again.

-- 
Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--    http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp