[NNTP] Re: Command names

[Ken Murchison]

Russ Allbery wrote:

> Ken Murchison <ken at oceana.com> writes:
> 
>>Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
>>
>>>Ken Murchison said:
> 
> 
>>>>I guess the only additional char (beyond what you've outlined) which
>>>>sticks out as potentially usable for keywords is '_'
> 
> 
>>>I think we only want one of '-' and '_'. I don't greatly care which,
>>>though I think the former is slightly preferable.
> 
> 
>>I don't care enough to make a big issue out of it.  I'll let the rest of
>>the WG (you and Russ) decide which one(s) will be used.
> 
> 
> I've been engaging in a completely irrational war against underscores for
> years, so I'm quite happy with a dash.  :)  (Really, I don't much care one
> way or the other, and can't see omitting '_' causing any real problems for
> anyone.)

Whatever we do, we should make sure that we're consistent with the use 
of the extension label as documented for the 401 response (which 
currently includes "MODE-READER").

-- 
Kenneth Murchison     Oceana Matrix Ltd.
Software Engineer     21 Princeton Place
716-662-8973 x26      Orchard Park, NY 14127
--PGP Public Key--    http://www.oceana.com/~ken/ksm.pgp