[NNTP] Capabilities in responses (Was: MODE READER)

Clive D.W. Feather clive at demon.net
Tue Nov 2 14:36:24 PST 2004


Ken Murchison said:
>>>	S: 200 [STARTTLS] NNTP server, negotiate TLS now

>> I'm still thinking on this. As I said before, it isn't compatible with NNTP
>> as currently specified but that's not irretrievable.
> 
> I'm not sure why this would be incompatible.  Obviously the ABNF would 
> have to change to accomodate this, but from a client perspective it 
> wouldn't be a big deal.  For a client which handles this, it parses the 
> contents of "[ ... ]", otherwise, it looks just like trailing-comment.

The problem is the other way round: a conforming RFC 977 server can already
produce such responses with meaningless contents.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <clive at demon.net>   | Tel:    +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert     | Home:  <clive at davros.org>  | Fax:    +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc            |                            |



More information about the ietf-nntp mailing list