[NNTP] Capabilities in responses (Was: MODE READER)
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at demon.net
Tue Nov 2 14:36:24 PST 2004
Ken Murchison said:
>>> S: 200 [STARTTLS] NNTP server, negotiate TLS now
>> I'm still thinking on this. As I said before, it isn't compatible with NNTP
>> as currently specified but that's not irretrievable.
>
> I'm not sure why this would be incompatible. Obviously the ABNF would
> have to change to accomodate this, but from a client perspective it
> wouldn't be a big deal. For a client which handles this, it parses the
> contents of "[ ... ]", otherwise, it looks just like trailing-comment.
The problem is the other way round: a conforming RFC 977 server can already
produce such responses with meaningless contents.
--
Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive at demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert | Home: <clive at davros.org> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
Thus plc | |
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list