[ietf-nntp] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-nntpext-authinfo-00.txt

[Jeffrey M. Vinocur]

On Fri, 30 Aprily 2004, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:

> (there are also two "a SASL" occurrences, one in a booktitle)

Yeah, I think we'll follow RFC 2831 here.  (Presumably it's done that way 
because many people pronounce "SASL" as "sazzle" and that would sound 
weird with "an".)


On Sat, 1 May 2004, Ruud H.G. van Tol wrote:

> > implementors
> 
> (implementers?)

Huh, both of these are valid...ok the base spec standardized on 
"implementers" so fine by me.

 
> > authentication mechanisms development 
> 
> (why the plural?)

Changed to "authentication mechanisms developed".

 
> Several <noun><space>which that look better to me when 
> changed to <noun><space>that.

I thought I'd noticed all of those.  (But yes, it's <noun><space>that and 
<noun><comma><space>which.)


> Implement at will, of course.

Other comments noted and appreciated.


-- 
Jeffrey M. Vinocur
jeff at litech.org