[ietf-nntp] draft21.pre-2
Clive D.W. Feather
clive at demon.net
Fri Mar 5 12:26:11 PST 2004
Russ Allbery said:
>> The argument for this is that we have gone to great lengths to allow the
>> client to determine which optional parts of the protocol are supported
>> by simply calling LIST EXTENSIONS. Skipping this for OVER by msgid and
>> forcing the the client to use trial and error seems like a step
>> backwards (or at least not a step forwards).
>
>> Unless there is a good technical reason why we shouldn't/can't do this,
>> I think we should add it just for completeness sake.
>
> Yeah, I think that's a perfectly reasonable and persuasive argument.
Okay, I'll do it over the weekend and then send draft 21 for publication.
--
Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <clive at demon.net> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert | Home: <clive at davros.org> | *** NOTE CHANGE ***
Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Fax: +44 870 051 9937
Thus plc | | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
More information about the ietf-nntp
mailing list